Section 497 (1), the first and third proviso panel codes (XLV of 1860), section 302 guarantees, mechanical inclusion in the grant of legal delays and the exclusion of days, the scope suspect claimed for more than two consecutive years. Was in custody, an adjournment by the accused without the end of the trial, whether necessary or unnecessarily deliberately or inadvertently, could further frustrate the dates of the hearing as he / she could be prosecuted for trial / evidence. Made a concerted effort to assemble and encourage all witnesses, complainants, etc. and also a desire to postpone it. The prosecution's part could shake the minds of the prosecution witnesses for the next few dates if not the least, and the mechanic's involvement and departure was not worked on the same day when the historical account of the dismissal sought by the accused The book or dates to consider when the Presiding Officer was in progress. The purpose of the holiday would not be postponed when the trial could begin as a request for a hearing was adjourned, the amount of the defendant's disqualification to proceed, the whole process would be frustrated and it would depend again on the appropriate date for the witnesses and Effective scheduling efforts will depend on those who cannot find time for the next date in their busy schedule or who cannot succeed. Third accused accused of delay in trial failed to file bail on legal bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
