MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus DISTRICT JUDGE, JACOBABAD
OI, R10 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition required party, Implementation of limitation and upon application of OI, R10, the plaintiff of the CPC was badly affected by the order passed by the lower appellate court. , The plaintiff was allowed to be the defendant as the plaintiff, that was, the request was moved by the plaintiff at a later stage when the evidence was closed and either party was involved. Allowing or replacing it is at the discretion of the parties with the court and the rules should depend on the facts and matters of the case. At any stage, the implementation and fairness of a party under the OI, R10, CPC is sufficient for its implementation for all subsequent stages of the OI, R10, CPC It was very broad and had to be used freely and no technical barrier could be considered strong enough to ignore the rights of justice or justice and there was no question of limitation. Evidence of a person transferring a case or transferring a case as a party was recorded and the decision was not ultimately reached by the trial court, therefore, the defendant's argument against the lower appellate court's ruling was not grounded. Which could have failed to raise any questions about the High Court. Refused to interfere with an order passed by the Lower Appellate Court, which has been dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
