MUHAMMAD ALI SHAIKH versus SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD.
A VII, R 11 & OI, R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), claim for dismissal of section 42 trial claim that this case can only be filed against a natural or legal person. Not that the title and the case cannot be dismissed against any official title or as part of Part VI or Order VII Rule 11, the CPC was by nature and stated under the power that only in exceptional circumstances I should exercise such powers where the court will conclude that even the court will come to that conclusion. If all the allegations are proved, then the plaintiff will not be entitled to any relief. The court had to look only to see if there was any cause of action and to see if the plaintiff could succeed in proving the case. ? Decisions are not made without the formulation of the cases and recording of the evidence. The defendant / authorities issued a demand notice on behalf of the company and the company to collect the money and they were present as the defendant. The virtual position that was the right and proper cause of action was the lawsuit of the company against the company and not its employees. The plaintiff acted properly and properly, the party could not be denied relief due to mismanagement or non-joiner; the wrong genders or non-jinders should be taken as soon as possible, in which failure should be waived. Should. The court had the power to add or strike the parties. Matters / matters should not be decided on technical matters The plaintiff may be instructed to file the amended title properly. Celebrate the name and designation if it has been suggested
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
