Jurisdiction for record-keeping on appeal of Article 89 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42, for a declaration document issued abroad. The evidence of the said minority copy was filed during the trial which was accepted by the trial court but it was dismissed by the High Court. Cannot have the status of a document / order issued by the courts of occupied Kashmir. The occupation of Kashmir was not yet decided to come under the jurisdiction of the foreign state, according to the UN Organization's resolutions that the people of Azad Jammu and Kashmir or the official document was not recognized. The plaintiff whom he intended to present was only a certified copy of the agency under the control of the occupied Kashmir government and was not certified under the certificate. Even if such a document was affirmed under the seal of the consul or diplomat, the same law could not be brought under Article 89 of the Constitution's martyrdom 1984 because Indian-occupied Kashmir did not have the status of a foreign country. Such a document was available to confirm that the original was in the possession of the same person who issued it. Such a document cannot be authenticated without any backlash and the evidence was not admissible. In that case the appeal was dismissed.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015
