Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR versus D.I.-G. PRISONS, LAHORE

Executive Staff (Capacity and Discipline) Rules, Section 4 of Punjab Jails, 1982 Punjab Civil Servant (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1975 Removal of Appellant from Employees, Temporary Warden was earlier suspended on charges of corruption. And then he was charged and removed from his job. The result of the inquiry in which the Inquiry Officer found him guilty appellant even though his government was under the executive jurisdiction of Punjab Jails (Talent and Discipline) Rules in 1982, but there is neither a charge sheet nor notice for any reason, nor. The order to dismiss him from the said Rolls show cause notice was issued under the purposed Punjab Civil Servants (Performance and Discipline) Rules 1975 which were not applicable to the appellant because the notice was filed by the Superintendent District Jail. Was issued under a signature that was wrongly shown to be authorized. Appoint the officer while the concept of an authorized officer did not make it part of the Punjab jail advocate for immigration from Sargodha lawyer