IJAZ HUSSAIN QURESHI versus CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
3, 4 and 5 disciplinary proceedings Inquiries of cross-examination Inquiries, a public servant, claimed that he was not allowed to cross-examine witnesses but did not mention the error either in front of the authorized officer or authority or the appellate authority. There is ample evidence of this in the appeal filed. He said that he was not denied the opportunity, so the appellant's confession was withheld from the appellant's process that he was punished for withholding the increment, which was only partial because of the law. As a valid appeal was dismissed in the case of a fine which was rejected under the amended order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kazi Ahmed lawyer
