Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZOHRAB versus CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS

Section 4 Appellant Firstster was first suspended after his dismissal and then dismissed when he allegedly failed to present his response to the notice of cause and personally appealed to the appellant. However, they claimed to have defended themselves. Within the stipulated time, the record showed that no documentary evidence was produced during the court proceedings to prove that the appellant was absent from duty and that the matter was decided on a note of the Range Officer. Was the one who allegedly caused a riot against her and submitted her report in twenty days. Instead of immediately listing it, there was a possibility that the court action against the appellant was the result of malpractice by the reporting officer. famous lower court advocate from Makran lawyer