MUHAMMAD YUNIS versus ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
R 13 8 (a) Promotion Appellant, who was constable, was excluded from List C II because he was found guilty because he failed to arrest the deceased offender while the appellant's duty in the police lines. The nature of the case was such that it was not possible for the appellant to perform any other duty as a whole and he had obtained more than 35 accreditation certificates which the appellant had an impeccable record and his name The Promotion List was featured in C1. His extraordinary performance was required to indicate a large penalty for removing the name from the list, but in the case of the appellant he was punished with no such punishment; the removal of the name of the applicant from CC II was against the law. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Bunner lawyer
