MUHAMMAD ASHRAF, A.S.I. versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Assistant Sub Inspector of Police who dismissed appellant R 6 3 was charged with corruption and misconduct; Special Judge, Anti-Corruption Appellant acquitted but the department was prosecuted and the Superintendent. He was dismissed by the police and his appeal was also rejected by the DIG. : However, the Additional Inspector General of Police accepted their review and ordered that the de novo trial should be considered by the authorities and that the leave from the job should be considered as any leave because the appellant requested That being punished in a criminal case can result in punishment. The court proceedings reversed unnecessary controversy
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
