Find a Lawyer

CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI versus NAZIR AHMED KHAN ADIB

Article 199 Constitution Allotment / Offer for Allotment of Plot Allotment / Offer for Allotment of Plot Against which the complaint was lodged before the Ombudsman, which was accepted that the Department / Applicants were of the view that The issuance of the allotment order was subject to compliance with the terms and conditions. The completion of certain formalities which was neither done nor any ownership of the right was to be issued after the completion of the terms. The cost of the occupation was not paid. The allotment order has been submitted within the stipulated period for the issuance of the allotment order. The allotment order did not mature in the final allotment order which seeks fulfillment of the terms of the said order / letter. The allotment / offer letter did not create any right. Nor could it be implemented because of shortcomings. Ombudsman misreading and misreading .The result of the omission was to cancel the word \ allotment ret Imp Impedance orders were put aside and the constitutional petition was accepted under the circumstances. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• Pir OMAR KHAYYAM v. Mrs. RUBY HAMEEDULLAH 2014 YLR 1654
• SARFARAZ AHMED v. Mst. NAHEED 2014 PCrLJ 1659
• MUHAMMAD YOUSIF TANIO v. State 2014 YLR 1665
• MUHAMMAD NASIR v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Housing and Town Planning, Islamabad 2014 CLC 1666
• UMER FAROOQ v. ATTOCK PETROLEUM LIMITED 2014 CLD 1672
• RAZI KHAN ALMANI v. JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, HYDERABAD 2014 PCrLJ 1673
• RASOOL BUX v. State 2014 YLR 1679
• ABDUL MALIK AWAN v. ARSALAN AHMED 2014 CLC 1685

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes