Articles 302, 324 and 34 of the conviction, the conviction of the joint intention evidence, the benefit of the doubt, the contradictions between the ocular testimony and medical evidence were brought forward by both the witnesses for the recovery of the crime. The weapons were the culprits for the recovery of the weapons, the required cohesion and alliance between the accused and the crime was not established, the prosecution's story was lacking, and the deposition of the eyewitnesses was not beyond reasonable limits. It is suspected that the recovery of the weapons made on the suspect's identification was deemed unnecessary, as the forensic science lab There was no positive report from the Republicans, Prosecutors prosecution of any legal action without any explanation to the police statement was recorded illegally phase. The absence of the palace's independent person, the test Ned witness, who was accused of taking advantage of all the favorable opportunities in the prosecutor's evidence, regardless of whether he took any such defense request. Whether or not the prosecution's evidence is not credible, nor is it consistent. Making false accusations against the accused in a lawsuit because of a strained marital relationship with the victim. And because of the enmity between his parents, and the complaining party, his involvement in the matter cannot be set aside, unless direct or concrete evidence is available and the crime cannot be attributed to any other evidence. In a particular case, it can be inferred from the evidence that there is no possibility, if accused, that he has been in jail for more than 12 years with no remission period, if he is convicted.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
