Sections 3, 4 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) and 265K of the Criminal Procedure Trial against the Unlawful Settlement Trial Section of the Illegal Settlement Act 2005 The request was dismissed by the complainant. The confiscation of the property in the dispute, but under Section 265, the CCPC also acquitted the accused, who both said that orders were passed by the same judge on the basis of the same evidence, and during the initial investigation, the police The report and the documents on record said that the results were inconsistent. Nor did they contradict each other, neither the parties were reviewed carefully, nor did they present any further documents or evidence, which could justify the change in the court's opinion, the allegations, statements, police reports and its On the same set of material, which was available when the trial court took heed and passed the order under which the prosecution was prosecuted, such powers should not be exercised as much as the prosecution should. Or to avoid litigation, and to decide on a qualifying case. After examining the evidence presented by the two parties, the trial court passed the verdict in the case and hastened it, the proper way was to record the evidence related to the interim examination of the two parties, and Then find out the truth or the lie. The charges were set aside, and the trial was heard in the trial court, which instructed to record the evidence and then decide the case strictly.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
