RAZI KHAN ALMANI versus JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, HYDERABAD
Sections 302, 114, 109 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7 and 21E of the Terrorism Act, Kadal-e-Azam, Abit, joint remand on remand by the Anti-Terrorism Court Applicant / Investigation Officer Appeal for KG grant was granted on further remand of the accused, but the Judge Anti-Terrorist Court had granted remand in judicial custody for 7 days instead of remanding the accused in police custody. Has been modified that will affect the process of a disputed order. The inquiry into the case that further evidence was to be collected with the cooperation and disclosure of the accused, and his daughter's allegation was that the court was particularly generous with the accused as a session judge. Demonstrated, the court paid, the accused is respected, even though he did not complain of physical or mental harassment at the hands of the police affected order, though he could not be challenged to seek Reeves. Jurisdiction of the Constitution, nor jurisdiction under section 6161 AA, CCPC, but this was a reasonable matter where the High Court Article may be requested extraordinary jurisdiction under which 199 were replaced as the petition and said that if the court is satisfied may be extended remand. That the accused has not been physically harmed or will not be the cause. Provided that the trial court failed to appreciate the plea granted by the applicant / Investigation Officer for further police remand, the police could not be arrested if the total period of such remand did not exceed 90 days.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
