O XL, R 1 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 34 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 8, 42 and 54 to obtain suit declarations, seizure, masonry profits and permanent injunction, scope subject matter The property left by the deceased parents of the parties has claimed their share in such property, while the defendant (brother) claimed to be the sole owner of the property due to an oral gift from his parents. Whereas in the event of a pendency of the plaintiff, the arbitration dispute seeks arbitration against the defendants not to receive rent from the tenants without their consent. N instructs the defendants to approach the court for assistance, which in turn demands the plaintiff defendant to stop the second case while filing a second case under arbitration 34. Judgment of the Arbitration Procedure The trial court appointed Nazir as the recipient for receiving rent, instructing the tenant and the defendants to deposit it in the Nazir account, preventing them from receiving future rent. Pass has been received. The defendants had their interests protected in connection with the rent they received. Such competing claims of the parties will be decided based on the evidence they add when the arbitral party wishes to appoint the recipient in relation to the suit property and makes a decision about it. Will As a result, there is a clear dispute between the parties that the decision of the appointment of the recipient in the present stage by the plaintiff will be in the interest of the party till the approval of the award by the arbitrator, which will appeal to the arbitrator of the High Court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
