Section 9 (c) police testimony delayed in sending testimonial testimony samples of drug addiction recovered from marijuana 9 candle and 30kg (390kg) vehicle containing all three suspects Trial Court sentenced the three accused And punished them. The sentence of life imprisonment was presented by the accused that there was four days of unreasonable delay in sending samples to the laboratory and that all witnesses to the recovery were police officers, the accuracy was, the law did not require that all prohibited material for opinion To be sent for chemical testing. Of the Chemical Examiner, only a portion was to be sent, a delay of four days in sending the samples could not be considered fatal, in the absence of objections to which it was tampered with or manipulated after four days of recovery. The chemicals were sent to the Examiner, but none of the complainant and the investigating officer's evidence raised the question of where the sample was located. The delay in sending the samples during these four days was unprecedented and prompted the prosecution. The case did not affect the case badly, although prosecution witnesses revealed the suspect in the FIR I was given a different weight than the alleged export of prohibited substances but only as it is not based on the difference in weight. He said the recovery from the accused had no effect and that he could not claim victory in such a heinous crime, including the death sentence unless the police personnel's evidence could be denied as a police officer. That it does not bring in any kind of defamation or enmity. False implications of the accused in the trial
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
