Section 302 (b) and 364 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), abduction or abduction of a person under the age of ten in section 7, Definition of acts of terrorism, in this case no other than in this case Evidence was not available. Proof of Admission and Situation The absence of molecular evidence may not be a reason for acquittal, but circumstances can be punished based on the evidence. If it turns out that the accused is connected with all aspects of the commission of the crime by the accused, even though the accused made additional judicial confession but no additional judicial confession was made by the accused, one of the reasons for the situation. That is, the additional, therefore, judicial confession was not available on the accused sidelink, in no way could it be insisted on establishing a connected chain to prove guilt against the accused, not just on the identification of the co-accused. ? The partner was affected by the defendant's home. Both links, indicating the whereabouts of the body, and the location of the recovery, could never be proved against the accused Medical evidence also denied the use of the recovered iron rod, the recovery of the weapons of crime. ? Did not seek medical evidence, while acquiring the co-accused, whose case was based on the same evidence, the principles of appreciation of the evidence were the same. The prosecution of some of the suspects and the culprits was not in the spirit of a safe criminal administration of justice, as well as the evidence against the accused, who was also acquitted of the accused, who was also acquitted. Was. The medical prosecution proved the charge against the accused beyond reasonable doubt
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
