Find a Lawyer

AHMED versus SECRETARY EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Article 199 Despite the constitutional petition, the order of appointment of the applicant on the basis of the Civil Service Appointment Agreement was issued after which no posting was given after the applicant had approached the High Court after considerable time. There was no explanation given in the series, which was a three-year term in employment. Already Ended Effect The High Court refused to exercise discretion under the constitutional jurisdiction and refused to relieve the applicant who had approached the High Court after a long period of time when his term of employment had already expired. The constitutional application was dismissed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• Syed ALI RAZA SHAH v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1308
• GHULAM NABI alias GULA v. State 2014 MLD 1311
• Mrs. MEHER ROHINTON MINWALLA v. DARAYUS CYRUS MINWALLA 2014 CLC 1312
• AIJAZ MAHMOOD v. HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION 2014 CLD 1313
• MUHAMMAD REHAN v. State 2014 MLD 1317
• MUHAMMAD ESSA v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2014 CLC 1318
• TALIB HUSSAIN v. State 2014 YLR 1319
• AMIR MEHMOOD v. State 2014 MLD 1323

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

us immigration advocates from Shadiwal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes