Find a Lawyer

MRS. MEHER ROHINTON MINWALLA versus DARAYUS CYRUS MINWALLA

50 50 Return of Power of Attorney by Party Impact Lawyer The applicant sought the reinstatement of his execution request, which was dismissed by his lawyer after the Power of Attorney's removal. After complying with the notice under Sindh Chief Court Rules (A Section) R50, the lawyer of the applicant was not required to take notice. Could not be neglected and the applicant was deliberately negligent in pursuing this matter. Applicant consistently failed to show dissatisfaction with prosecuting his case, High Court refuses to resume execution

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE TANDO JAM through T.M.O. and Taluka Administration (Rural) Taluka, Hyderabad v. ARJAN KUMAR 2014 YLR 1304
• MUHAMMAD URS v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Home Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 1306
• Syed ALI RAZA SHAH v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1308
• GHULAM NABI alias GULA v. State 2014 MLD 1311
• AIJAZ MAHMOOD v. HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION 2014 CLD 1313
• AHMED v. SECRETARY EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2014 PLC(CS) 1313
• MUHAMMAD REHAN v. State 2014 MLD 1317
• MUHAMMAD ESSA v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2014 CLC 1318

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

how to become a advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes