Section 9 (c) Defines evidence from drug possession and trafficking. The accused persons clearly understood the allegations leveled against them, in which case the witness was an excise officer, their evidence would not be false and could not be excluded, unless they were unethical and disclosed. ? Or the interested defendants admitted in their statements on the oath that there was no enmity with their official religious witnesses, that the testimony of such witnesses could not be left aside, unless the contrary was proved. Until the trial court had convinced him to the extent of the recovery, there was no restriction on the complainant of the drug addicts from the vehicle. The Investigation Officer was alleged to have been the driver of the vehicle and the driver had to be considered as recovered. Knowledge of available marijuana. And such views were based on the evidence that was alleged, in the circumstances, that he was rightly punished.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
