Section 497 Prohibition Code (XLV of 1860, Sections 365B, 376, 371A, 371B & 344) Forcing a woman to abduct or marry, etc., to sell a person for sexual immorality purposes, for prostitution purposes Buying a person for), etc., imprisonment for a false imprisonment for ten or more days, denial of a co-accused, alleging that they had abducted the abductor / complainant and imprisoned him in one place. The FIR was directly accused of committing the crime where the accused allegedly committed adultery. Although the abductor had stated in court that he had entered into a marriage contract with the co-accused, his statement was given because of fear of his life, because the accused pressured him to abduct. The car was in the custody of the accused. And since the date of his abduction to the co-accused, such a statement was not the only destination for his acceptance of the bail in the prosecution version Medical evidence proved that the delay in the registration of the FIR was explained by the fact It was held that the abductor / complainant was in illegal confinement of the accused and the co-accused as such situation is beyond his control. There is no evidence against Malala against the complainant or the accused in the police crime record. has been. Fake and falls within the prohibited clause of section 497, the PC suspect was denied bail accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
