O XX, Rr 4 & 5 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 117 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 8, 42 and 54 for the collection of confiscation, declaration and injunction restraining To prove the issue, the trial court and the lower appellate court did not produce the results in the verdict passed in favor of the defendants. Accurate judgments include (i) a brief statement of the case, (ii) points of determination, (iii) finding of a decision or court case strategy, if the matters were not interconnected, and (iv) decisions. The reasons for this should not only explain the results of the court but also the evidence and how it helped the trial court's conclusions, where the cases were set up and the evidence recorded, none of them. The reason must be presented. Although the verdict may be an ex parte decision, the trial court demonstrated material determinism and irregularities if it did not provide any reasons for its decision in relation to the determination / point of view. There was no hearing option. The verbal and documentary evidence included by the parties to issue a trial order without scan, analysis, evaluation and recording could not have been assigned to the plaintiff simply because the defendant or his Did not examine the witnesses or did not include evidence. To prove a fact, the law was unhadat 1984, 1984 1984 1984 under Article 1 of Article Article, it was on the shoulders of someone who raised the same, not from the court to provide relief by the party. I had to approach, take off my burden and stand on it. Thanks for the success
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
