FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE/CHAIRMAN versus NAYA DAUR MOTOR (PVT) LTD.
Sections 73, A. XXXIV, Rr 12 and 13 of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 2017 and 202 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intellectual Property Mortgaged Property Rights of Government In order to fulfill the decree passed in favor of the financial institutions, the State Commission directed the state court, under which the customs authority raised, that the government's liabilities in the sale had a preferential right to clearance. The judgment against the lending company was decided by order. The original date was approved by the customs authorities in 15 2000, but even such determination was made on 9 show 9 1992, almost 8 years after the issuance of the showcase notice. During this period, the customs authorities did not hesitate to approach the High Court, nor even after the order was actually passed in the year, the 2000 Customs Authorities applied only under Section 73, CPC in 2005. Had approached the High Court. The public department, which was not directly against or against the property sold by the court, can only be given a preference when making a mortgage or charge in connection with the property of such instability. It was already determined that the charge was made in the favor of mortgages / financial institutions in the year 1987, even if the order was to be taken as the important date in the actual date of 152 2000, then the property Much was passed after the history of the Division Bench mortgage. High Court refuses to interfere in Single Judge's High Court Judgment, refusing to approve government liability for sale process
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
