Section 497 Appropriation Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337H (2), 114, 148 and 149 Conspiracies, speedy and negligence, presence of advertisement, disturbance, refusal to delay filing of FIR It was explained that there was no quarrel between the parties, and that the firing and the accused were called to have a specific role of fatal injury, the two parties were based in the same village and knew each other well. Before the incident, there was a dispute between the children. And after harsh words, the parties did not agree to communicate with each other even though they belonged to different sects, but there was no evidence to indicate that the alleged crime was any The result of the sectarian conflict in which the accused was specially designated, and the direct and special role in the FIR had the effect that the accused allegedly fired directly at the victim with his pistol crime weapon. Run, the pistol was recovered and the accused Ques presented it. The level of darkness cannot be determined at the scene of the incident. Nor can it be assumed that deep testimony and discussion of the evidence at the bailout stage will certainly affect any party's case. The accused was a key culprit who fired live shots that killed the deceased on the right. The turn of his stomach that resulted in the death of the deceased cannot be equated with the role of the co-accused whose bail was already granted, making the accused a first case to consider the bail exception. I was unsuccessful in requesting the accused in the initial stage, dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
