Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUBIN versus STATE

Article 303030 Admission of injury to irrigation works or wrongfully turning to water Kept. Neither his name nor any of the accompanying accused appeared in the FIR (incident). Additional judicial confession could not be used against the other accused, except to prove that some strong evidence was obtained by the prosecution. For the extra-judicial confession, the prosecution conceded in favor of the courts that the defendant was convicted of a material illegality and irregularity, which was a disregard of the rule of law while disregarding the evidence on record. The accused was convicted and sentenced by two lower courts The accused has been acquitted

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• MUHAMMAD ALI SHAIKH v. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD. 2014 YLR 444
• AL-RAUF BUILDERS through Sole Proprietor v. Pir MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE SARHANDI 2014 CLD 454
• Syed ALTAF HUSSAIN v. IRSHAD AHMED 2014 MLD 457
• FARZANA v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION KHAMBHRA 2014 PCrLJ 460
• BILAL INTERNATIONAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman 2014 PTD 465
• OWAIS AHMED IDRIS v. Syed MUHAMMAD WAQAR UDDIN 2014 PLD 465
• ZULIFQUAR AHMED v. MAHMOOD ABBAS 2014 PLD 468
• Syed MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR SHAMSHAD v. MUKHTIARKAR SALEHPAT 2014 MLD 471

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

solicitors from Muzaffarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes