RAHAM DAD versus STATE
The accused was apprehended on the spot on the testimony of sections 9 (c) and 9 (b) of the evidence, which was made of various umbrellas / slabs with a weight of 13 grams, as it was recovered by the witnesses. The case was fully supported. And even though he was a police officer, he had no hesitation in proposing falsehoods from the accused, and he was such a good witness as other prosecution witnesses have stated that 100 grams of sample ras has been used only by an umbrella. Was isolated and no evidence of it was available. The rest of the substances recovered at the behest of the accused was also rasa chars on which the accused was convicted under Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act 1997, and consequently in section 9 (b) of the said Act. Was changed and sentenced. The sentence of life imprisonment was reduced to seven years \ RI is fine under the circumstances \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Swabi lawyer
