Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD versus STATE

In sections 302 (b), 324, 337d, 452/34, the presence of the injured woman in the house, her presence in the house was natural, not only the presence of another injured witness, but also her presence. It was also proved that he suffered a serious injury during the incident and the passing of another witness to the prosecution of his sister's house could not be termed unusual because he said he had come to the injured woman's mansion. To breastfeed him, saying that two injured witnesses gave a very consistent account of the incident. His statements were convincing, coherent, and natural. Syed's witnesses confirmed each other on almost all material points, both witnesses successfully examining the long test. There was no prior hostility or ill-will toward the accused against them, so the statements of the statements made by the medical evidence were fully supported by the medical evidence and the blood-stained ground from the roof of the women's house. The facts of the lifting were confirmed. A domestic incident took place, giving a detailed statement on the oath. She was a true and natural witness. None of the witnesses was produced locally in support of the defendant's defense request and the defense request was also not supported; the circumstances of the trial also led to the prosecution's finding of credible direct evidence. Was proved with. With the full support of medical evidence and confirmation of the circumstances of the case, no benefit could be given to the accused on the basis of the opinion of the police; the accused, who was sentenced to death, according to his birth certificate, was 18 when you need a advocate from Takhtbai lawyer