ALLAH DITTA versus AMINA BIBI
Defendant Plaintiff Plaintiffs Unconditional Plaintiffs Plaintiffs in front of an Uneducated Woman Under Section 42 and Title 54, so the controversial Heba was arrested on a suit that is the result of fraud and misrepresentation. The plaintiff failed to produce a male member, which was present at the time of the alleged transaction of the plaintiff's family, also failed to prove the offer, acceptance and possession of the gift, the trial court and the lower appellate court Returned the verdict in favor of the accused plaintiff. Nor was any witness summoned to fulfill the required conditions and gifts, gifts were not presented in the circumstances The decision of both courts to be consistent and coherent was based on the independent application of the court's mind and the appraisal of the fair assessment and the entire evidence. Was. The defendants highlighted the extent to which it is deemed conclusive that the judge suffered a misunderstanding by the two courts below, not misinterpreting and reading the evidence, based on the reasons given by the lower courts for good reasons. And were in accordance with the law enacted by the High Courts to deal with the decisions of such cases. And the orders of both the courts to be free from any jurisdictional error and illegality were not open to any exception and the High Court's intervention in exercising its jurisdiction over the High Court refused to interfere with these decisions. Which were approved by the courts under review. Dismiss in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kotla Pathan lawyer