Find a Lawyer

RAFIQ AHMAD versus KHAN MUHAMMAD

Sections 203, 247, 369 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 396/324, the Court of Session, restored the private complaint dismissed on the basis of illegal prosecution and subsequently summoned the accused. To confess, that the private complainant cannot complain. Having been dismissed by Sessions Court for non-section 247 of the prosecution, the PCP was the only clause in the Code of Criminal Procedure that dealt with the effect of not appearing to the complainant, but for different reasons, Could not refrain, because previously it had no jurisdiction, secondly, that the private complaint was at an early stage and the accused was not summoned, and third, that the private complaint was filed by the complainant against the accused. The allegations made were not identifiable, but some of them were unauthorized sections 203, even though the CCP had before the accused was summoned. I have to remove the case, then the only way it can be presented. After considering the complainant's statement (if any) and the outcome of the investigation or inquiry (if any) under Section 202, the CRPC and the court have adjourned the matter to proceed with the complaint. And there is no sufficient basis for the accused to be summoned. Section 203, CR PCC was also not attracted to this matter, as the complaint was dismissed for illegal proceedings only and without considering the material contained in the records used in section 369, the CCP did not consider this review. Was the only decision which imposed certain conditions and there was no right to amend or amend the court's order. how to become a advocate from Jehangira lawyer