Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE

Section 392 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR was filed in the FIR, name of the constitutional petition for the termination of the applicant and was charged with committing an abusive argument. The applicant was involved in this case on the basis of enmity from the vendor. There was no force whatsoever because the petitioner's lawyer did not in any way indicate on the record in favor of my declaration made by the complainant, as he was satisfied with the innocence of the accused, himself. Was also not enough. The High Court could neither interfere with the duties of the police in the investigation process to eliminate the FIR that was under investigation, nor was the dispute between the parties a fact that could neither be provoked nor could the High Court. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the FIR could be resolved by repealing it as invalid. At the present stage, the request for prosecution was rejected immigration advocates phone number from Tobatek Singh lawyer