Find a Lawyer

RAB NAWAZ versus JUSTICE OF PEACE

The applicant, on the ground that Section 22A of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199A of Section 22A of the Constitution, cancellation of the FIR application under CRPC, that the defendant is non-proprietary and owns the landed property; In order to seize his property, he has been wrongfully listed as his parent. In the school record, the son of the respondent claimed that the defendant was childless, the son of his son was written without good faith and without any misconduct and no fraud was committed by the applicant on which justice was done. K Justice had ordered registration of the case. Respondent did not file any petition with the police against the applicant nor did he appear before the Section HO in connection with the case. Was not offered in support of, arrested only by the petitioners under Section 22 ACPC The complaint was filed in the name of the respondent in question was still in the name of the respondents and no benefit was obtained by either the applicant or his M / s Anwar Beta petition under Section 22 ACPC Does not disclose the commission of a confessional offense The defendant's complaint can be successfully resolved through appropriate action to improve the school record. The lawyer for the defendant cannot identify any legal proceedings that can be drawn. In cases where the approved orders of Justice of Peace are non-permanent, they are set aside \ r \ n \ r \ n law websites from Hariwala lawyer