Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAR versus ALLAH DITTA

Section 12 of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act (v. 1912), Section 19, the specific performance of the contract of sale of property is claimed by the defendant's deceased father's right to sell his land in his favor. Implemented the agreement, which the accused later exchanged. The trial court, dismissed by the provincial government, rejected the case but the lower appellate court allowed the appeal and ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The land in dispute was owned by the provincial government and the deceased father's defendants were without permission. They couldn't sell it. Under Section 19 of the Public Land Colonial Law (Punjab) Act, 1912, the authorities were neither in the possession of the defendants nor did the defendants have any right in respect of the lower appellate court which was owned by the provincial government. Was. And no agreement was made by the plaintiffs and there was no official land number in the dispute at that time to be vested in favor of the defendants, therefore, it could not be sold by them, the case in respect of the land owned by the defendants. Failure to file, in return for which the defendants had obtained no evidence of the validity of the agreement. The sale was executed and the defendants were paid Rs. 5,000 / of. The plaintiffs failed to exercise jurisdiction to review all the legal heritage of the deceased owner of the High Court, judgment and order of the lower appellate court. It was restored, keeping the name aside. Accordingly, the trial court's review allowed tax advocates from Wazirabad lawyer