ARSHAD ALI TABSSUM versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
During the investigation of the termination of service of Section 5 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act (VII of 1974), Judge Kim Judicial Magistrate inquired on a complaint in the charge of aggressive behavior and inappropriate behavior, in which the appellant. Partially accepted the charges in which they submitted their affidavit. Affidavit affirmed the contents of the complaint, however, after that they unconditionally waived the appellant, the appellant did not contend with that statement, as well as the affidavit that the appellant's statement was once Had decided to initiate disciplinary proceedings, the authority had no issue the legal right to change the pre-emptive procedure (termination of employment), therefore, to adopt another option without terminating the investigative proceedings. I admit the authority of the authority was unnecessary especially when the dismissal had compiled a stain of authority. Under the provisions of T and the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, the authority had the power to approve the probation for any probationary period without any reason, in the present case the authority had earlier decided to inquire and This inquiry reached a logical conclusion when the inquiry officer's notice brought that the parties had reached a compromise and that fact was neither challenged nor objected to at any stage of proceedings against them. That the Chief, despite recording these examinations, had the appellant in his presence to examine the complainant Failed to seize the opportunity, which is equivalent to accepting the charges stated in the statement
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2015
