MAZHAR GILANI versus REGISTRAR LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
The appellant worked under six reporting officers under the Section 10 Punjab Judicial Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), termination of section 5 service by regular inquiry into serious allegations and only one of the appellants. The service's negative remarks were recorded. He was eliminated during the investigation without being questioned on the basis of allegations of corruption without any solid evidence. Appellant is allegedly prioritizing corruption and reporting officer authority over personal remarks filed by one reporting officer on the other's information. Five reporting officers to be valid with no credible and solid evidence - The opinion of one reporting officer should not have been given priority and higher weight than the other five reporting officers, who had to file an applicant with no claimed service record. And was given the priority by any of the reporting officers. Without a D tail inquiry, it was unreasonable - the drawing of the appellant's precise opinion because the fraud is corrupted by instinct, can only be determined on the basis of concrete evidence and examples if any of the persons by the instigation \ In the event of a good or bad habit or trait, it was very difficult for the aforesaid person to conceal it and it was not possible for the appellant to be brought before the other five reporting officers to corrupt the accused by corrupt seizure. vag was found to be vague, sketchy, inconsistent and tainted. With some outrageous and personal contradictions, appeals to the observation of a reporting officer in the absence of any evidence can be found on the remaining records of the Punjab Sub-judicial Services Tribunal.
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2015
