R 3 (c) (iii) Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), Remarks Regular Inquiry Against Section 5 Judicial Officer Annual Secret Report, A Civil Judge, dismissed for slip corruption, dismissed. Based on the negative remarks recorded in the ACR from the service, the Edward Remarks recorded in the three ACRs were challenged by the appellant, which was dismissed by the authority against negative numbers Service Tribunal Service Tribunal re-legalized Could not inspect The above three ACRs had reached the deadline, allegations leveled against the appellant through the documents were supported, no formal inquiry was required before proceeding with the appellate authority against the appellant. Regular inquiry into the matter was rightfully suspended. el s dismissed from service earned by appellant Three consecutive negative ACRs touching his integrity were found guilty of corrupt reputation and liable to commit major fines Appellant was a judicial officer. And the fact that he earned three consecutive negative ACRs was a legitimate basis for proving his reputation as a criminal. Being Corrupted By the appellant's act, the Judicial Officer's authority rightfully imposed the sentence on the appellant's dismissal. The unknown order did not suffer from any weakness or judicial defect in circumstances r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2015
