MIAN QAMAR UL ISLAM versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
R4 (b) (iv) Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), Section 5 Appellant Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate and a written complaint was made against him, in which the complainant alleged that the appellant. Has called for illegal seizure of it. In favor of a civil suit decision. The complainant refused to pay her, after which, the appellant dismissed her case, an inquiry was made against the appellant, and the inquiry officer informed her findings that some of the allegations were fully settled. And on the basis of these findings it was proved against the appellant against the appellant. Removed from service The judicial officer is expected to safeguard his credibility Brokers, corrupt and greedy judicial officers were not acceptable in the judiciary and the Public Reporting Officer in his ACR column was less than average. Appellant was reviewed. The ACR's counseling noted that on two occasions, the appellant was directed to pay more attention to his work, and was told that his reputation was at stake, he also evaluated the appellant. Not that it is useful to maintain the service anymore, all remarks were supported. Counseling officer Appellant did not improve himself and failed to protect his integrity Appellant had a common and permanent reputation of being a corrupt judicial officer, even before the complainant filed a complaint against him. Did not raise any bias or misconduct requests, based on credible content, information and personal observations made by the authority.
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2015
