Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CITY MULTAN

Sections 3, 5 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), dismissing the appeal from hearing of the appeal against the appellant, were dismissed from the job, with no formal inquiry alleging that he had committed a moral offense. What was the criminal case for? A case was registered against him and the appellant was acquitted of the criminal charges leveled against him by the trial court. Saeed, based on the prosecution's testimony and other documentary evidence, was hearing those cases in those cases which were behind those bars. , Could not get their own defense, the basic principle of natural justice of the authorities was rejected, no one will be condemned. Appellant was fired when he was helpless, should the authorities have full opportunity. Defendant defended himself and then proceeded to proceed on the basis of the results of the regular proceedings Angus / Inquiries were placed aside defective orders and the appellant was reinstated in the service. The department may take regular action under the law, including regular inquiries during which the appellant stayed away from the job, a decision by the competent authority that was pending. online advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer