Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TASLEEM SHOUKAT versus S.S.P: BATTALION COMMANDER NO.1, LAHORE P.C., ABBAS LINES

Sections 3, 5 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), dismissed from the Appeal Service against the Appellant, were dismissed after issuing the showcase notice, but deliberately disobeying the responsibility. Without having a regular investigation against them based on their presence. Due to this the notice was a serious malfunction, no regular inquiry was made in this regard, under this section, the Removal Service (Special Powers) Ordinance under section 5 of the Ordinance 2000 Absent orders were maintained by the appellate authority, with no modification, absenteeism was treated with leave without pay, absenteeism was considered unpaid leave, it was stated that the legal weakness was so Seriously, they can't be ignored because they made unforgettable orders. The undesirable orders were set aside and the appellant was reinstated to face new proceedings, including a rig, under the law, an illegal investigation, a period of absence and which the appellant Has just done his job, the decision will be taken by the competent authority as a result of the new action. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sadiqabad lawyer