Find a Lawyer

SHARAFAT ALI versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (HEALTH), NAROWAL

Sections 4 (1) (b) (v), 5, 10, 16 and 19 apply for removal from office against the appellant on charges of conspiracy to loot public money and to remove him from public employment. The conviction was appealed against the appellant. After an inquiry against them, he was charged by the Department of Authority in which no statement of any person was recorded which could indicate the appellant's involvement in the said robbery / robbery case. The case showed the prosecutor as a witness, but in the court proceedings, he was accused of being involved in a robbery case. Without the support of concrete evidence, the contentious position of the departmental authorities was unsustainable and there were illogical departmental powers which did not present any credible evidence against the appellant, the allegation was not proved and the appellant was reinstated. Was gone and it would be an interruption period to be treated as a proper kind of leave list of supreme court advocates from Pannu aqil lawyer