Find a Lawyer

DR. MUBASHIR HASSAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Offerings and sections 6 and 7 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 184 (3) under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution challenge the challenge of the National Reconciliation Ordinance 2007 and suspend proceedings of sections 6 and 7 of the unwanted ordinance. To pray According to applicants' fears, these two sections have the option of self-governing, so if the public is allowed to continue to object to the filing of petitions under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, the public official may benefit. Will be disappointed with It is intended to take advantage of this, usually the provisions of the law cannot be suspended as the Supreme Court can only suspend a particular order, decision or action. However, the Supreme Court observed that it was intended to be pulled by any advantage. The public office holder will be subject to the judgment listed and the beneficiary will not be entitled to claim any prov. Under any rule under sections 6 and 7 of the National Reconciliation Ordinance 2007, if the Supreme Court concludes that it The unidentified ordinance and especially its aforesaid provisions have been declared controversial, the Constitution's Supreme Court directed the respondents to issue notices. Also, three important lawyers were ordered to be sent after important questions of public / national interest were raised in the applications required under the Attorney General for Pakistan for O XXVII A, CPC and O XXIX, R 1, Supreme Court Rules 1980. Appeals to help the court as AmexCrease are directed to schedule a hearing after three weeks \ r \ n patent advocate from Poonch lawyer