Find a Lawyer

SHAMSHAD BEGUM versus MST. HUMA BEGUM

Sections 15 (2) (ii) and 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Exemption on the basis of tenants default - the tenant / applicant appearing before the tenant controller in payment of premises rent And demanded that it be postponed. The tenant was provided with accommodation three times to file a written statement and thus incurred more than the appropriate time, but no written statement was filed through it, respondents / landlord's request. And the request for removal by the Rent Controller was not allowed. According to the constitutional application maintained in the appeal, the petition filed by the applicant against the contemporaneous decisions of the powers below was rejected by the High Court. The applicant was unable to indicate to the lawyer any false recordings, incorrect formulation of evidence or to not read any material of evidence. Due to a jurisdictional error, the applicant / tenant did not plead their case before the following forums, they were rightfully presented, with no exceptions. Upon the request of the rental controller, the applicant is responsible for fighting the case, explaining his point of view and proving that there was no default in paying the rent on his part. Neither illegally nor jurisdictionally declined to interfere with the lower courts' interference with the final outcome of the facts, but it acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction and Accordingly the request was dismissed, in the circumstances \ r \ n jobs for advocates from Burewala lawyer