CANTONMENT BOARD FAISAL CANTT., KARACHI versus MUHAMMAD ADIL KHAN ,ABDUL GHAFFAR, QAZI MAUHAMMAD SHAMIM
Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 420, 468, 471 /, 109 and 34 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Guaranteed , After the grant of respondent's bail was granted by the Grant High Court, the petitioner sought leave to appeal against him that the inquiry into the matter had been completed long ago, and did not serve any useful purpose in holding the respondents. It may be, that the respondents were getting exemption on bail from last term for over a year and there was no allegation that the respondents misused such privileges. Refuses to interfere with the exercise of arbitrariness by T, unless it is shown that it has been used in a defamatory way, in a misleading manner or in violation of prescribed principles. The law did not appear to be an unusual case, nor was there any compulsion by the High Court to interfere with arbitrary proceedings; no grounds were made for permission to leave, jobs were dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Sajawal lawyer