Find a Lawyer

SHAHID ORAKZAI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Appointment of constitutional application under Arts 2, 2A, 41, 168, 177, 178, 180, 184 (3), 196, 203, 255 and 260 non-Muslim judges or Chief Justice or Acting Chief Justice of Pakistan, Arts 184 (3) The constitution challenging the appointment, subject to the constitution, the principle of equality before the law and the equality before the law, the legislature may make the law prohibiting the appointment of a non-Muslim citizen against a particular position. In which he may be appointed as a judge or chief justice of the Superior. Courts were not forbidden by the constitution or by any law; the senior most Supreme Court judge, even if it was non-Muslim, could be constituted as acting Chief Justice in the absence of the Chief Justice, e.g. That the application can be heard in the nature of the warrant. No such application can be sustained against the appointment of the acting Chief Justice of Pakistan under the Article if the appointment of a person as a Superior or inferior court was not made in accordance with the law and the Constitution. 180 of the Constitution or the appointment by the Chief Justice of Pakistan under Article 177 on the basis of which such a petition was un-Muslim was filed or established with the purpose of damaging the dignity of the Chief Justice of Pakistan. Instead of forwarding such an application, the Chief Justice of the place had to waste public time and burden the public exchequer, so a good cause was filed to discredit the petitioner of the judiciary. immigration advocates phone number from Malakwal lawyer