Find a Lawyer

RANA MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN versus RANA IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN

Section 152 (1) (j) Sales Tax Act (VII VI of 1990), Sections 33 (4) (a) (f), 34 and 37A Partnership Act (I32 of 1932), Sections 25 and 58 of the District Moderator, ineligible The candidate opted for the Receipt of Macro sales tax and non-payment of penalty by payment of receipt of the refund claim from the candidate as the sole partner against the fake receipts while rejecting the papers nomination. Civil and criminal proceedings against him begin by constitutional petition against candidate's nomination papers against his arrest Nomination papers against nomination papers rejected Appellate Tribunal Department's Appeal Tribunal Order Appealing to Affect Recovery From The Appeal Tribunal Order Following the withdrawal of the constitutional application for arrest of the candidate appealing against the refusal, stringent measures are pending. The legitimate candidate was aware of his firm's obligations to the sales tax department, who, as its partner, was the partner's responsibility to pay the firm's tax liabilities. Did not refuse, so the effect of withdrawing the constitutional petition was the same as returning Fesar's order remained vacant, thus the candidate's disqualification was restored, after which he did not receive a steel order, the collection of such tax was not prohibited by the candidate, failure of the candidate to recover such There will be a limit to obtain a counter-order. He was declared a tax evader and was not satisfied that the candidate had been disqualified to contest the election. law firms from Khanqah Sharif lawyer