Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus STATE

Article 302 (b) / 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) were requirements; the ocular testimony was rejected by medical evidence. The crime scene recovered from the scene was fired from the rifle of the accused. That the witnesses were close relatives of the deceased and their evidence required independent support for the safe administration of justice, which was not available against the accused, and his case needed to be verified to confirm it. That his conviction is based on the principles of the administration of the criminal justice case. In light of the above disputes, the accused needs to be examined momentarily and the leave of appeal was given to the accused to re-interpret the evidence on record. list of advocates from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer