Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus NAZIR AHMED

XVII, Section 2 and 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the trial court dismissed the non-recording statement of the plaintiff's case on the ground that he was able to present his evidence despite many opportunities. The failed appellate court set aside the order passed by the trial court and the case was remanded, which was upheld by the High Court, whose hearing was dismissed, on the day when The plaintiff was in attendance and assisted with OXVII, an R2CPC could be done. In spite of the fact that the defendant did not present the testimony at the trial, instead of immediately dismissing the case, the plaintiff should have asked to come to the testimony. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the orders under the two courts. law firms from Sehar Baqlas lawyer