Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALAMZEB KHAN versus REGISTRAR, PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR

Section 5 North West Frontier Province (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, Rr 3 and 4 North West Frontier Province Government Rules, 1987, R4A (b) dismissed by the Judicial Officer, his For 12 years in the service of credit, allegations of favoritism, misuse of court proceedings and misappropriation of powers, the state was deprived of a large sum of money and its liability officer was found guilty of prejudice. given. Allegations of good order of service and the absence of an officer are serious in nature, needed to be proven directly by positive evidence The record shows that in addition to the officer's allegations, the officer was charged with filing a crime. I was nothing. The inquiry report also disclosed that no illegal restitution was taken by the officer mentioned in order to show the record that the officer was considering passing orders for any illegal release / consideration questions. Made against the officer, did not reveal any involvement and allegations of misconduct and misconduct could not be proved by the complainant nor any address was on record despite the third inquiry, loss to the government, if any If so, it was not because of the officer's fault but by the act of some other officials of different departments that the wrongdoing was not done, if any, it was abolished and thus action was taken against the officer. There was no complaint for that and there was no reason. The officer was not allowed any opportunity to investigate the evidence presented against him and, as such, family advocate from Jehanian lawyer