Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE

Section 426 Sentencing and bail bail by the High Court were primarily given on the basis that the trial court stated in its judgment that the witnesses of the prosecution were not present or witnessed it. That all investigations say that the complainant and the prosecution witness were not present at the scene of the incident nor did the incident occur in the manner that the prosecution's decision reached through the trial court that the witness was not present at the time of the incident. Were. It was based on its reasons and was not merely based on the opinion of the police, the trial court also noted that the arms were not recovered from the vacant sites when the merit of the accused could be offered in this case. Was. The High Court's disputed order regarding the hearing of the petition for suspension of sentence was neither serious, nor logical nor arbitrary, and the reasons recorded by the High Court were dismissed from the record, the Supreme Court refused to intervene. done best advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer