Find a Lawyer

MST. RASHEEDA BIBI versus MUKHTAR AHMAD

Articles 42 and 54 declare a claimant to challenge the gift act registered by the claimant, which is a fraud and collective transaction, renders their rights ineffective and interferes with their proprietary and proprietary tricks on the property in dispute. Defendants who were allegedly executors of the gift pledge were barbarous, uneducated, plain-hearted, rural women who disputed her execution It was not enough to acknowledge the impression or presentation of the thumb before the sub-registrar that the donors ) Intended to transfer his share (in dispute) to his father and his father, respectively. Was obtained by the husband as the legal heir, but the registration of a document in itself was not legally subject to legal proof of its implementation by any person, by whom it was alleged that Has been executed, if any of the parties was denied his execution by the person mentioned in the litigation, in the present case, these persons were executed in this case he made such document Disagreements, therefore, require the person who claims to have executed this document to provide proof of this under the law. I need to prove that fact was implementing it. solicitors from Sahiwal lawyer