UMAID ALI versus STATE
Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the attackers was not known to the complainant nor was his son held in the police station by the prosecution witnesses after parade four. During the days of the arrest of the accused magistrate and the Investigation Officer, they clearly specified the accused's names to identify with the witnesses of the identification parade, and, therefore, were completely excluded by police. Didn't come out empty. On the night of the incident and it was a fraudulent retrieval, and the fake mail in the laboratory could not be recorded in any way to link the accused to the commission of the crime; the courts failed to fully appreciate the evidence in its true context. The principles of the benefit of the doubt, which were abundantly available on record, were exempted from the charges
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer