Find a Lawyer

JAVAID SIDDIQ versus MUHAMMAD JAVAID UMAR KHAN

A IX, R 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The former Decree, aside from the absence of the defendant and his lawyer's suit for recovery of PF money O XXXVII, CPC The defendant filed an agreement at 10 ala 10 under. 2000, and time was saved to apply for defense leave Case 13 was raised on 10 2000 but was not removed by any of the defendants and the case was adjourned, even on a postponed date. Defendant's proceedings against the defendant were initiated and after recording the earlier evidence, the trial court granted the OICX, R13, CPC, separation of ex parte decree. In its application, the plaintiff's verdict was pronounced, did not state any reason for his absence or his counsel plea was requested by the plaintiff. It was not the absence of conflict. The High Court cited valid reasons for maintaining the trial and upholding the decision of the case filed by the defendants. y Appeal denied by trial court-levy to interfere with previous decision attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Musafir Khana lawyer